A product go/no-go screen applied before committing to a niche, combining a demand check with a profitability stack:
Excluding PPC from the margin calculation is deliberate — it's a pre-ad-spend profitability floor, meant to leave enough headroom that ad spend doesn't erase the margin once launch PPC starts.
Related to Minimum Daily Profit Benchmark (Product Go/No-Go Threshold) and Safe Niche Threshold Checklist, which apply similar go/no-go logic with different thresholds.
Apply: reject a candidate product immediately if it fails any one of the four numbers — don't proceed to sourcing quotes on a product that only clears three of the four.
The £7-per-unit floor (alongside 80% ROI and 30%+ margin) is calculated excluding PPC costs, and is deliberately set wide specifically to leave room for ad spend that can't be sized until after launch — per-unit PPC cost is unknowable before the product is actually live and running campaigns. Reject any candidate that fails any of the three thresholds before ordering samples.
When applying this filter to candidates surfaced through the Store Rate Method (Recursive Seller-Catalog Mining), the volume and price-floor checks are done first, in that order, ahead of deeper analysis like seasonality.
One presenter's first-pass version of this filter uses two checks before moving to seasonality or other screens: (1) demand that is steady and "runs deep" across many listings in a niche, roughly 100–200+ units/month per listing being a workable zone for a new seller, and (2) a price-point floor around £20, since "below £20, it can be quite difficult to make a profit selling on Amazon." Demand that "runs deep" (spread across many listings) is treated as a distinct, preferable signal from a niche simply having high top-line demand concentrated in few listings, since the latter is described as "a huge financial risk" if that demand drops off.
Из тем: Product Research & Validation